which of the following might a limited government be more likely to do than an unlimited government?

Question

1. build and maintain public roads
2. protect citizens from attack
3. operate public schools
4. let citizens speak freely and protest

Answer 1

A limited government is typically characterized by restrictions on its powers and a focus on protecting individual rights and freedoms. In contrast, an unlimited government may exert more control over its citizens and society.

Among the options presented, a limited government would be more likely to:

4. Let citizens speak freely and protest.

This is because limited governments often uphold principles of individual freedoms and rights, including freedom of speech and the right to assemble. In contrast, unlimited governments may restrict these rights to maintain control over the population and suppress dissent.

While limited governments can also build and maintain public roads, protect citizens from attack, and operate public schools, the emphasis on individual liberties makes option 4 the most distinctive feature of a limited government in contrast to an unlimited government.

Answer 2

which of the following best describes the purpose of government?
1. to make trade deals with other countries
2. to maintain law and order in a country
3. to ensure everyone has a job
4. to determine the boundaries between countries

Answer 3

Among the options provided, the statement that best describes the primary purpose of government is:

2. to maintain law and order in a country.

The fundamental role of government generally includes creating and enforcing laws, ensuring public safety, and maintaining order within society. While governments may engage in trade deals, address employment, and determine boundaries, these functions are often seen as secondary to the overarching goal of maintaining law and order.

Answer 4

which of the following are ways two countries can peacefully settle disputes? Select the two correct answers.
1. declaring war
2. establishing trade barriers
3. negotiating treaties
4. disregarding trade agreements
5. appealing to international courts

Answer 5

The two correct answers for ways two countries can peacefully settle disputes are:

3. negotiating treaties
5. appealing to international courts

Negotiating treaties allows countries to come to mutual agreements to resolve their differences, while appealing to international courts provides a legal framework for dispute resolution that can be accepted by both parties. The other options, such as declaring war, establishing trade barriers, and disregarding trade agreements, typically escalate tensions rather than promote peaceful resolution.