Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?(1 point)

Responses

A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.
A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.

The opinions may provide clues to the sources feelings and possible bias.
The opinions may provide clues to the sources feelings and possible bias.

Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.

The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.

1 answer

The most appropriate response is:

The opinions may provide clues to the sources feelings and possible bias.

This is because understanding the opinions of a source can give historians insights into the context in which the source was created, the motives behind the information provided, and any potential biases that may affect the reliability of the facts reported.