Question 1
To complete the statement, we first evaluate the function \( h(t) = -16t^2 + 5t + 15 \) at \( t = 1 \):
\[ h(1) = -16(1)^2 + 5(1) + 15 \] \[ h(1) = -16 + 5 + 15 = 4 \]
So, the completed statement is:
The interpretation of \( h(1) \) is that at 1 second, Martha's height is 4 feet from the water's surface.
Question 2
The cost function for the tuxedo rental company is given by \( t(d) = 50d + 200 \).
The cost starts at $200 (the flat fee) and increases by $50 for each additional day the tuxedo is rented.
Here are some possible costs based on the number of days \( d \):
- For \( d = 0 \): \( t(0) = 200 \)
- For \( d = 1 \): \( t(1) = 250 \)
- For \( d = 2 \): \( t(2) = 300 \)
- For \( d = 3 \): \( t(3) = 350 \)
- For \( d = 4 \): \( t(4) = 400 \)
Thus, reasonable scales for the vertical axis considering realistic rental scenarios would be:
- $200
- $250
- $300
- $350
- $400
Among the options provided, reasonable scales for the vertical axis that could be selected based on the cost model are:
- $100
- $400
While the $100 mark isn't precisely on our calculated values, it is a reasonable scale for visualization, especially in a wider range graph. Thus we could select:
Responses include:
- $100
- $400
If only exact multiples of $50 are desired for clearer increments, we might choose:
- $200
- $250
- $300
- $350
- $400
If you can pick exact increments based on your model, use those that span the range of values expected based on \( d \). Ultimately, you can select whichever of the options are most relevant to your requirements.