Yes, I’m sure. Let's clarify the reasoning step by step regarding the original expression \(-4(2x + 5)\) and the given options.
The expression \(-4(2x + 5)\) can be simplified by distributing \(-4\) to each term inside the parentheses, resulting in:
\[
-4 \times 2x + (-4) \times 5 = -8x - 20.
\]
Now, let's analyze each option:
A. (−4÷2x)+(−4÷5)
This option involves division and does not represent distribution. It would yield \(-2 + -0.8\), which is not correct.
B. (−4×2x)+(−4×5)
This option correctly represents the distributed form:
\[
(-4 \times 2x) + (-4 \times 5) = -8x - 20.
\]
This is indeed the same as \(-4(2x + 5)\).
C. (−4+2x)×(−4+5)
This option represents a product of two binomials, which is not equivalent to distributing \(-4\) and leads to a different expression entirely.
D. (−4−2x)+(−4−5)
This option does not make sense in terms of distribution and does not lead to the correct simplified form.
So, the only correct option that simplifies to \(-8x - 20\) is indeed:
B. (−4×2x)+(−4×5)
If there are any further details you'd like to clarify or explore, feel free to ask!