Question
How does the section “what they found” contribute to the overall validity of the author’s claims
By providing evidence from from the study to prove that managed honeybee colonies contract viruses from wild bumblebees
By explaining the study’s results to show that viruses in wild bumblebees is related to their nearness to honeybee apiaries
By describing how the black cell queen virus and deformed wing virus affect honeybees and bumblebees differently
By outlining the significance of the distinction researchers found between infected ees and bees that carried the viruses.
By providing evidence from from the study to prove that managed honeybee colonies contract viruses from wild bumblebees
By explaining the study’s results to show that viruses in wild bumblebees is related to their nearness to honeybee apiaries
By describing how the black cell queen virus and deformed wing virus affect honeybees and bumblebees differently
By outlining the significance of the distinction researchers found between infected ees and bees that carried the viruses.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The section "what they found" contributes to the overall validity of the author's claims by providing concrete evidence and data from the study that illustrates the relationships between managed honeybee colonies and wild bumblebees. Specifically:
1. **By providing evidence from the study to prove that managed honeybee colonies contract viruses from wild bumblebees** - This directly supports the claim that there is a transmission pathway for viruses between these bee populations.
2. **By explaining the study’s results to show that viruses in wild bumblebees is related to their nearness to honeybee apiaries** - This explanation adds context to the findings, establishing a correlation that underscores the potential for virus transmission due to proximity, reinforcing the dangers of managed honeybee colonies in relation to wild populations.
3. **By describing how the black cell queen virus and deformed wing virus affect honeybees and bumblebees differently** - This description highlights the implications of the viruses on both species, helping to clarify the significance of the findings and their relevance to overall bee health.
4. **By outlining the significance of the distinction researchers found between infected bees and bees that carried the viruses** - This distinction is crucial for understanding the dynamics of virus transmission and the health of bee populations, adding depth and complexity to the implications of the study’s results.
Overall, this section strengthens the author’s claims by providing specific findings, contextual relationships, and implications that are backed by data, thereby enhancing the credibility and reliability of the conclusions drawn in the study.
1. **By providing evidence from the study to prove that managed honeybee colonies contract viruses from wild bumblebees** - This directly supports the claim that there is a transmission pathway for viruses between these bee populations.
2. **By explaining the study’s results to show that viruses in wild bumblebees is related to their nearness to honeybee apiaries** - This explanation adds context to the findings, establishing a correlation that underscores the potential for virus transmission due to proximity, reinforcing the dangers of managed honeybee colonies in relation to wild populations.
3. **By describing how the black cell queen virus and deformed wing virus affect honeybees and bumblebees differently** - This description highlights the implications of the viruses on both species, helping to clarify the significance of the findings and their relevance to overall bee health.
4. **By outlining the significance of the distinction researchers found between infected bees and bees that carried the viruses** - This distinction is crucial for understanding the dynamics of virus transmission and the health of bee populations, adding depth and complexity to the implications of the study’s results.
Overall, this section strengthens the author’s claims by providing specific findings, contextual relationships, and implications that are backed by data, thereby enhancing the credibility and reliability of the conclusions drawn in the study.