Simplify the following

Which of the theories on language development is correct? Ironically, all three theories
hold elements of the truth, and a synthesis or integration of the theories would be much
more realistic. Supporters of such an integrated approach point out that learning theory
seems to offer the best explanation of how sounds, words, and meanings are learnt. Social
pragmatism explains the enhancement of social interaction, while nativism provides a
better explanation of the creative aspect of language ability.
Most modern psychologists are of the opinion that language acquisition cannot be
understood fully by investigating either the environmental or the genetic factors in isolation.
Thus, the prevailing view is that children are born with an innate ability to learn language
and that learning and experience activate and reinforce this ability (see Santrock, 2019).
More specifically, it has been realised that a complex and dynamic interaction between
hereditary factors, maturation factors, learning strategies and the social environment
exists. None of the factors on its own can result in language acquisition. Instead of asking
which factor is the most important, research efforts should concentrate on investigating
the nature of the interaction between the various factors. Methods that investigate multiple
factors will be a better reflection of the complexities involved in language acquisition.