Asked by APPLE INNER
How many more games will Aditi have to win to have an 80% winning record?
The linear equation that models this is___________
Raj and Aditi like to play chess against each other. Aditi has won 12 of the 20 games so far. They decide to play more games.
How many more games will Aditi have to win to have a 70% winning record?
12 + x = 0.70(20 + x)
x = x equals StartFraction 20 Over 3 EndFraction is approximately 6.67. ≈ 6.67
She will have to win 7 more games to have a 70% winning record.
Aditi would have to win
20
more games to have an 80% winning record.
The linear equation that models this is___________
Raj and Aditi like to play chess against each other. Aditi has won 12 of the 20 games so far. They decide to play more games.
How many more games will Aditi have to win to have a 70% winning record?
12 + x = 0.70(20 + x)
x = x equals StartFraction 20 Over 3 EndFraction is approximately 6.67. ≈ 6.67
She will have to win 7 more games to have a 70% winning record.
Aditi would have to win
20
more games to have an 80% winning record.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine how many more games Aditi needs to win to achieve an 80% winning record, let's define:
- Let \( x \) be the number of additional games Aditi wins.
- Currently, Aditi has won 12 games and played a total of 20 games.
After winning \( x \) more games, her total number of wins will be \( 12 + x \) and her total number of games played will be \( 20 + x \).
We want Aditi's winning percentage to be 80%, which can be set up in the following equation:
\[
\frac{12 + x}{20 + x} = 0.80
\]
Now, we solve for \( x \):
1. Multiply both sides by \( 20 + x \) to eliminate the fraction:
\[
12 + x = 0.80(20 + x)
\]
2. Distribute \( 0.80 \):
\[
12 + x = 16 + 0.80x
\]
3. Rearranging the equation gives:
\[
12 + x - 0.80x = 16
\]
4. Combine like terms:
\[
12 + 0.20x = 16
\]
5. Subtract 12 from both sides:
\[
0.20x = 4
\]
6. Divide both sides by 0.20:
\[
x = \frac{4}{0.20} = 20
\]
So, Aditi would need to win **20 more games** to have an 80% winning record.
The linear equation that models this situation is:
\[
12 + x = 0.80(20 + x)
\]
- Let \( x \) be the number of additional games Aditi wins.
- Currently, Aditi has won 12 games and played a total of 20 games.
After winning \( x \) more games, her total number of wins will be \( 12 + x \) and her total number of games played will be \( 20 + x \).
We want Aditi's winning percentage to be 80%, which can be set up in the following equation:
\[
\frac{12 + x}{20 + x} = 0.80
\]
Now, we solve for \( x \):
1. Multiply both sides by \( 20 + x \) to eliminate the fraction:
\[
12 + x = 0.80(20 + x)
\]
2. Distribute \( 0.80 \):
\[
12 + x = 16 + 0.80x
\]
3. Rearranging the equation gives:
\[
12 + x - 0.80x = 16
\]
4. Combine like terms:
\[
12 + 0.20x = 16
\]
5. Subtract 12 from both sides:
\[
0.20x = 4
\]
6. Divide both sides by 0.20:
\[
x = \frac{4}{0.20} = 20
\]
So, Aditi would need to win **20 more games** to have an 80% winning record.
The linear equation that models this situation is:
\[
12 + x = 0.80(20 + x)
\]
Answered by
APPLE INNER
solve the equation
6.8x+9.3=-2.6-17x
6.8x+9.3=-2.6-17x
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the equation \( 6.8x + 9.3 = -2.6 - 17x \), we will follow these steps:
1. Move all terms involving \( x \) to one side of the equation, and constant terms to the other side.
Starting with the original equation:
\[
6.8x + 9.3 = -2.6 - 17x
\]
2. Add \( 17x \) to both sides to get all \( x \) terms on the left side:
\[
6.8x + 17x + 9.3 = -2.6
\]
3. Combine the \( x \) terms:
\[
(6.8 + 17)x + 9.3 = -2.6
\]
\[
23.8x + 9.3 = -2.6
\]
4. Now, subtract \( 9.3 \) from both sides:
\[
23.8x = -2.6 - 9.3
\]
5. Combine the constants on the right side:
\[
23.8x = -11.9
\]
6. Finally, divide both sides by \( 23.8 \):
\[
x = \frac{-11.9}{23.8}
\]
Calculating that:
\[
x \approx -0.499
\]
So, the solution to the equation \( 6.8x + 9.3 = -2.6 - 17x \) is approximately:
\[
x \approx -0.499
\]
1. Move all terms involving \( x \) to one side of the equation, and constant terms to the other side.
Starting with the original equation:
\[
6.8x + 9.3 = -2.6 - 17x
\]
2. Add \( 17x \) to both sides to get all \( x \) terms on the left side:
\[
6.8x + 17x + 9.3 = -2.6
\]
3. Combine the \( x \) terms:
\[
(6.8 + 17)x + 9.3 = -2.6
\]
\[
23.8x + 9.3 = -2.6
\]
4. Now, subtract \( 9.3 \) from both sides:
\[
23.8x = -2.6 - 9.3
\]
5. Combine the constants on the right side:
\[
23.8x = -11.9
\]
6. Finally, divide both sides by \( 23.8 \):
\[
x = \frac{-11.9}{23.8}
\]
Calculating that:
\[
x \approx -0.499
\]
So, the solution to the equation \( 6.8x + 9.3 = -2.6 - 17x \) is approximately:
\[
x \approx -0.499
\]
Answered by
APPLE INNER
distribute
combine terms
add 17x
subtract 9.3
divide 23.8
and get -0.5!! the answer
Heidi solved the equation
3(x + 4) + 2 = 2 + 5(x – 4). Her steps are below:
3x + 12 + 2 = 2 + 5x – 20
3x + 14 = 5x – 18
14 = 2x – 18
32 = 2x
16 = x
Use the drops-downs to justify how Heidi arrived at each step.
Step 1:
distributive property
Step 2:
combine like terms
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
combine terms
add 17x
subtract 9.3
divide 23.8
and get -0.5!! the answer
Heidi solved the equation
3(x + 4) + 2 = 2 + 5(x – 4). Her steps are below:
3x + 12 + 2 = 2 + 5x – 20
3x + 14 = 5x – 18
14 = 2x – 18
32 = 2x
16 = x
Use the drops-downs to justify how Heidi arrived at each step.
Step 1:
distributive property
Step 2:
combine like terms
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's analyze Heidi's steps and fill in the justifications for each. Here's how we can justify each part of her solution:
### Step 1:
Heidi starts with:
\[
3(x + 4) + 2 = 2 + 5(x - 4)
\]
**Justification:** **Distributive property** - She distributes \( 3 \) over \( (x + 4) \) and \( 5 \) over \( (x - 4) \).
### Step 2:
She simplifies the equation:
\[
3x + 12 + 2 = 2 + 5x - 20
\]
to:
\[
3x + 14 = 5x - 18
\]
**Justification:** **Combine like terms** - She combined \( 12 \) and \( 2 \) on the left side, and \( 2 \) and \( -20 \) on the right side.
### Step 3:
From:
\[
3x + 14 = 5x - 18
\]
to:
\[
14 = 5x - 3x - 18
\]
**Justification:** **Subtraction property of equality** - She subtracts \( 3x \) from both sides to isolate terms involving \( x \) on one side.
### Step 4:
Rearranging the equation gives:
\[
14 + 18 = 2x
\]
**Justification:** **Addition property of equality** - She adds \( 18 \) to both sides to combine constants.
### Step 5:
Finally, she computes:
\[
32 = 2x
\]
and then:
\[
x = 16
\]
**Justification:** **Division property of equality** - She divides both sides by \( 2 \) to solve for \( x \).
Here’s a summary of the justifications:
- **Step 1**: Distributive property
- **Step 2**: Combine like terms
- **Step 3**: Subtraction property of equality
- **Step 4**: Addition property of equality
- **Step 5**: Division property of equality
Let me know if you need any more information or assistance!
### Step 1:
Heidi starts with:
\[
3(x + 4) + 2 = 2 + 5(x - 4)
\]
**Justification:** **Distributive property** - She distributes \( 3 \) over \( (x + 4) \) and \( 5 \) over \( (x - 4) \).
### Step 2:
She simplifies the equation:
\[
3x + 12 + 2 = 2 + 5x - 20
\]
to:
\[
3x + 14 = 5x - 18
\]
**Justification:** **Combine like terms** - She combined \( 12 \) and \( 2 \) on the left side, and \( 2 \) and \( -20 \) on the right side.
### Step 3:
From:
\[
3x + 14 = 5x - 18
\]
to:
\[
14 = 5x - 3x - 18
\]
**Justification:** **Subtraction property of equality** - She subtracts \( 3x \) from both sides to isolate terms involving \( x \) on one side.
### Step 4:
Rearranging the equation gives:
\[
14 + 18 = 2x
\]
**Justification:** **Addition property of equality** - She adds \( 18 \) to both sides to combine constants.
### Step 5:
Finally, she computes:
\[
32 = 2x
\]
and then:
\[
x = 16
\]
**Justification:** **Division property of equality** - She divides both sides by \( 2 \) to solve for \( x \).
Here’s a summary of the justifications:
- **Step 1**: Distributive property
- **Step 2**: Combine like terms
- **Step 3**: Subtraction property of equality
- **Step 4**: Addition property of equality
- **Step 5**: Division property of equality
Let me know if you need any more information or assistance!
Answered by
APPLE INNER
What is the value of n in the equation –negative StartFraction one-half EndFraction left-parenthesis 2 n plus 4 right-parenthesis plus 6 equals negative 9 plus 4 left parenthesis 2 n plus 1 right-parenthesis.(2n + 4) + 6 = –9 + 4(2n + 1)?
n =
n =
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the equation
\[
-\frac{1}{2}(2n + 4) + 6 = -9 + 4(2n + 1),
\]
let’s break it down step by step.
1. **Distribute \(-\frac{1}{2}\)** on the left side:
\[
-\frac{1}{2}(2n + 4) = -\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2n - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 4 = -n - 2.
\]
Therefore, the left side becomes:
\[
-n - 2 + 6 = -n + 4.
\]
2. **Distribute \(4\)** on the right side:
\[
4(2n + 1) = 4 \cdot 2n + 4 \cdot 1 = 8n + 4.
\]
Therefore, the right side becomes:
\[
-9 + 8n + 4 = 8n - 5.
\]
Now we re-write the equation:
\[
-n + 4 = 8n - 5.
\]
3. **Add \(n\)** to both sides:
\[
4 = 9n - 5.
\]
4. **Add \(5\)** to both sides:
\[
4 + 5 = 9n,
\]
which simplifies to:
\[
9 = 9n.
\]
5. **Divide by \(9\)** to solve for \(n\):
\[
n = 1.
\]
So the value of \(n\) is
\[
\boxed{1}.
\]
\[
-\frac{1}{2}(2n + 4) + 6 = -9 + 4(2n + 1),
\]
let’s break it down step by step.
1. **Distribute \(-\frac{1}{2}\)** on the left side:
\[
-\frac{1}{2}(2n + 4) = -\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2n - \frac{1}{2} \cdot 4 = -n - 2.
\]
Therefore, the left side becomes:
\[
-n - 2 + 6 = -n + 4.
\]
2. **Distribute \(4\)** on the right side:
\[
4(2n + 1) = 4 \cdot 2n + 4 \cdot 1 = 8n + 4.
\]
Therefore, the right side becomes:
\[
-9 + 8n + 4 = 8n - 5.
\]
Now we re-write the equation:
\[
-n + 4 = 8n - 5.
\]
3. **Add \(n\)** to both sides:
\[
4 = 9n - 5.
\]
4. **Add \(5\)** to both sides:
\[
4 + 5 = 9n,
\]
which simplifies to:
\[
9 = 9n.
\]
5. **Divide by \(9\)** to solve for \(n\):
\[
n = 1.
\]
So the value of \(n\) is
\[
\boxed{1}.
\]
Answered by
APPLE INNER
Yes the answer is 1 also i liked any of the mini bot comments if they CORRECT
Which of these equations have no solution? Check all that apply.
2(x + 2) + 2 = 2(x + 3) + 1
2x + 3(x + 5) = 5(x – 3)
4(x + 3) = x + 12
4 – (2x + 5) = (–4x – 2)
5(x + 4) – x = 4(x + 5) – 1
Which of these equations have no solution? Check all that apply.
2(x + 2) + 2 = 2(x + 3) + 1
2x + 3(x + 5) = 5(x – 3)
4(x + 3) = x + 12
4 – (2x + 5) = (–4x – 2)
5(x + 4) – x = 4(x + 5) – 1
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which of these equations have no solution, we need to solve each equation and analyze the results. An equation has no solution if it simplifies to a false statement (like \(0 = 1\)).
### 1. Equation:
\[
2(x + 2) + 2 = 2(x + 3) + 1
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
2x + 4 + 2 = 2x + 6 + 1 \implies 2x + 6 = 2x + 7
\]
**Subtract \(2x\) from both sides:**
\[
6 = 7 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation **has no solution**.
### 2. Equation:
\[
2x + 3(x + 5) = 5(x - 3)
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
2x + 3x + 15 = 5x - 15 \implies 5x + 15 = 5x - 15
\]
**Subtract \(5x\) from both sides:**
\[
15 = -15 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation **has no solution**.
### 3. Equation:
\[
4(x + 3) = x + 12
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
4x + 12 = x + 12
\]
**Subtract \(x\) from both sides:**
\[
3x + 12 = 12
\]
**Subtract \(12\) from both sides:**
\[
3x = 0 \implies x = 0
\]
This equation has a solution (\(x = 0\)).
### 4. Equation:
\[
4 - (2x + 5) = (-4x - 2)
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
4 - 2x - 5 = -4x - 2 \implies -2x - 1 = -4x - 2
\]
**Add \(4x\) to both sides:**
\[
2x - 1 = -2
\]
**Add \(1\) to both sides:**
\[
2x = -1 \implies x = -\frac{1}{2}
\]
This equation has a solution (\(x = -\frac{1}{2}\)).
### 5. Equation:
\[
5(x + 4) - x = 4(x + 5) - 1
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
5x + 20 - x = 4x + 20 - 1 \implies 4x + 20 = 4x + 19
\]
**Subtract \(4x\) from both sides:**
\[
20 = 19 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation **has no solution**.
### Summary of Results:
The equations that have no solutions are:
- \(2(x + 2) + 2 = 2(x + 3) + 1\)
- \(2x + 3(x + 5) = 5(x - 3)\)
- \(5(x + 4) - x = 4(x + 5) - 1\)
Thus, the equations with no solutions are:
- **1, 2, and 5**.
### 1. Equation:
\[
2(x + 2) + 2 = 2(x + 3) + 1
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
2x + 4 + 2 = 2x + 6 + 1 \implies 2x + 6 = 2x + 7
\]
**Subtract \(2x\) from both sides:**
\[
6 = 7 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation **has no solution**.
### 2. Equation:
\[
2x + 3(x + 5) = 5(x - 3)
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
2x + 3x + 15 = 5x - 15 \implies 5x + 15 = 5x - 15
\]
**Subtract \(5x\) from both sides:**
\[
15 = -15 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation **has no solution**.
### 3. Equation:
\[
4(x + 3) = x + 12
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
4x + 12 = x + 12
\]
**Subtract \(x\) from both sides:**
\[
3x + 12 = 12
\]
**Subtract \(12\) from both sides:**
\[
3x = 0 \implies x = 0
\]
This equation has a solution (\(x = 0\)).
### 4. Equation:
\[
4 - (2x + 5) = (-4x - 2)
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
4 - 2x - 5 = -4x - 2 \implies -2x - 1 = -4x - 2
\]
**Add \(4x\) to both sides:**
\[
2x - 1 = -2
\]
**Add \(1\) to both sides:**
\[
2x = -1 \implies x = -\frac{1}{2}
\]
This equation has a solution (\(x = -\frac{1}{2}\)).
### 5. Equation:
\[
5(x + 4) - x = 4(x + 5) - 1
\]
**Expanding:**
\[
5x + 20 - x = 4x + 20 - 1 \implies 4x + 20 = 4x + 19
\]
**Subtract \(4x\) from both sides:**
\[
20 = 19 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation **has no solution**.
### Summary of Results:
The equations that have no solutions are:
- \(2(x + 2) + 2 = 2(x + 3) + 1\)
- \(2x + 3(x + 5) = 5(x - 3)\)
- \(5(x + 4) - x = 4(x + 5) - 1\)
Thus, the equations with no solutions are:
- **1, 2, and 5**.
Answered by
APPLE INNER
Which equation is an identity?
3(x – 1) = x + 2(x + 1) + 1
x – 4(x + 1) = –3(x + 1) + 1
2x + 3 = 2 x plus 3 equals StartFraction one-half EndFraction left-parenthesis 4 x plus 2 right-parenthesis plus 2.(4x + 2) + 2
StartFraction one-third EndFraction left-parenthesis 6 x minus 3 right-parenthesis equals 3 left-parenthesis x plus 1 right-parenthesis minus x minus 2.(6x – 3) = 3(x + 1) – x – 2
3(x – 1) = x + 2(x + 1) + 1
x – 4(x + 1) = –3(x + 1) + 1
2x + 3 = 2 x plus 3 equals StartFraction one-half EndFraction left-parenthesis 4 x plus 2 right-parenthesis plus 2.(4x + 2) + 2
StartFraction one-third EndFraction left-parenthesis 6 x minus 3 right-parenthesis equals 3 left-parenthesis x plus 1 right-parenthesis minus x minus 2.(6x – 3) = 3(x + 1) – x – 2
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which equation is an identity, we will analyze each equation to see if both sides are equivalent for all values of \(x\). An equation is considered an identity if it simplifies to a true statement (such as \(0 = 0\)) for all \(x\).
### 1. Equation:
\[
3(x - 1) = x + 2(x + 1) + 1
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
3x - 3
\]
Right side:
\[
x + 2x + 2 + 1 = 3x + 3
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
3x - 3 = 3x + 3
\]
Subtract \(3x\) from both sides:
\[
-3 = 3 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation is not an identity.
### 2. Equation:
\[
x - 4(x + 1) = -3(x + 1) + 1
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
x - 4x - 4 = -3x - 4
\]
Right side:
\[
-3x - 3 + 1 = -3x - 2
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
-3x - 4 = -3x - 2
\]
Subtract \(-3x\) from both sides:
\[
-4 = -2 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation is not an identity.
### 3. Equation:
\[
2x + 3 = \frac{1}{2}(4x + 2) + 2
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
2x + 3
\]
Right side:
\[
\frac{1}{2} \cdot 4x + \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2 + 2 = 2x + 1 + 2 = 2x + 3
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
2x + 3 = 2x + 3
\]
This holds true for all \(x\), thus this equation is an **identity**.
### 4. Equation:
\[
\frac{1}{3}(6x - 3) = 3(x + 1) - x - 2
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
\frac{1}{3} \cdot 6x - \frac{1}{3} \cdot 3 = 2x - 1
\]
Right side:
\[
3x + 3 - x - 2 = 2x + 1
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
2x - 1 = 2x + 1
\]
Subtract \(2x\) from both sides:
\[
-1 = 1 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation is not an identity.
### Summary:
The equation that is an identity is:
\[
2x + 3 = \frac{1}{2}(4x + 2) + 2
\]
Thus, the answer is the **third equation**.
### 1. Equation:
\[
3(x - 1) = x + 2(x + 1) + 1
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
3x - 3
\]
Right side:
\[
x + 2x + 2 + 1 = 3x + 3
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
3x - 3 = 3x + 3
\]
Subtract \(3x\) from both sides:
\[
-3 = 3 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation is not an identity.
### 2. Equation:
\[
x - 4(x + 1) = -3(x + 1) + 1
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
x - 4x - 4 = -3x - 4
\]
Right side:
\[
-3x - 3 + 1 = -3x - 2
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
-3x - 4 = -3x - 2
\]
Subtract \(-3x\) from both sides:
\[
-4 = -2 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation is not an identity.
### 3. Equation:
\[
2x + 3 = \frac{1}{2}(4x + 2) + 2
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
2x + 3
\]
Right side:
\[
\frac{1}{2} \cdot 4x + \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2 + 2 = 2x + 1 + 2 = 2x + 3
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
2x + 3 = 2x + 3
\]
This holds true for all \(x\), thus this equation is an **identity**.
### 4. Equation:
\[
\frac{1}{3}(6x - 3) = 3(x + 1) - x - 2
\]
**Expanding:**
Left side:
\[
\frac{1}{3} \cdot 6x - \frac{1}{3} \cdot 3 = 2x - 1
\]
Right side:
\[
3x + 3 - x - 2 = 2x + 1
\]
**Setting the simplified forms equal:**
\[
2x - 1 = 2x + 1
\]
Subtract \(2x\) from both sides:
\[
-1 = 1 \quad (\text{False})
\]
This equation is not an identity.
### Summary:
The equation that is an identity is:
\[
2x + 3 = \frac{1}{2}(4x + 2) + 2
\]
Thus, the answer is the **third equation**.