Question
If a biologist wants other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, what would be the most effective method for doing so?(1 point)
Responses
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
provide evidence to support the argument
provide evidence to support the argument
conduct an experiment to study the argument
Responses
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
provide evidence to support the argument
provide evidence to support the argument
conduct an experiment to study the argument
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The most effective method for a biologist to have other scientists accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs would be to **provide evidence to support the argument**. This is crucial because scientific acceptance relies heavily on empirical data and evidence. While generating a testable question and conducting experiments are also important steps in the scientific process, presenting solid evidence is the most direct way to persuade others of the validity of a new argument.