I agree with Hans J. Morgenthau's assertion that the national destiny of the United States has often been framed in antimilitaristic and libertarian terms. Historically, the U.S. was founded on principles that valued individual liberty and a skepticism of standing armies. For example, the Founding Fathers, fearing the tyranny often associated with militaries in Europe, emphasized the need for a civilian-led government and limited military involvement in civilian affairs. This is evident in the debates surrounding the establishment of a standing army, where leaders like George Washington advocated for a temporary force during crises rather than a permanent military presence. Additionally, the nation’s reluctance to engage in foreign entanglements, as articulated in George Washington's Farewell Address, reflects a broader antimilitaristic sentiment, advocating for diplomacy over military action. These historical precedents demonstrate that the U.S. has often prioritized liberty and limited military engagement as central to its national identity.
Read the provided passage.
“Throughout the nation's history, the national destiny of the United States has been understood in antimilitaristic, libertarian terms.”
- Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations
P.E.E.L. Response
Write a 1 paragraph response answering the question below.
Do you agree or disagree with Morgenthau's statement? Use evidence from Lesson 1.02 - 1.05 or prior knowledge from United States History to support your response.
1 answer