Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
How does the Closure Property prove that the sum of a rational and irrational number is irrational?(1 point) Responses Irration...Question
How does the Closure Property prove that the sum of a rational and irrational number is irrational?(1 point)
Responses
Irrational numbers can be added or subtracted.
Irrational numbers can be added or subtracted.
The sum or difference of a rational and irrational number is a rational number.
The sum or difference of a rational and irrational number is a rational number.
The sum or difference of two rational numbers is a rational number.
The sum or difference of two rational numbers is a rational number.
The sum of an irrational and rational number can’t be predicted.
Responses
Irrational numbers can be added or subtracted.
Irrational numbers can be added or subtracted.
The sum or difference of a rational and irrational number is a rational number.
The sum or difference of a rational and irrational number is a rational number.
The sum or difference of two rational numbers is a rational number.
The sum or difference of two rational numbers is a rational number.
The sum of an irrational and rational number can’t be predicted.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To prove that the sum of a rational and an irrational number is irrational, we can use the closure property of numbers.
The closure property states that when you perform a mathematical operation (like addition) on a set of numbers, the result is still within that set if the set is closed under that operation.
1. **Rational Numbers**: The sum of two rational numbers is always rational (closure property of rational numbers).
2. **Irrational Numbers**: The closure property does not apply to irrational numbers in the same manner.
Let's assume that the sum of a rational number (let's call it \( r \)) and an irrational number (let's call it \( i \)) is rational. If we denote the sum as \( s = r + i \), we can rearrange that to \( i = s - r \). Since \( s \) would be rational (as we assumed) and \( r \) is rational, \( s - r \) must also be rational (closure property of rational numbers). But that leads to a contradiction because we assumed \( i \) is irrational.
Thus, the assumption that the sum \( s \) is rational must be false, proving that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is indeed irrational.
Given the answer choices provided, none of them accurately captures this reasoning. However, the correct reasoning can be summarized as:
- The sum or difference of a rational and irrational number is irrational.
So, the correct understanding would be that they could indeed rephrase this as:
- The sum or difference of a rational and an irrational number is not rational, thus it must be irrational.
None of the provided options correctly reflect this.
The closure property states that when you perform a mathematical operation (like addition) on a set of numbers, the result is still within that set if the set is closed under that operation.
1. **Rational Numbers**: The sum of two rational numbers is always rational (closure property of rational numbers).
2. **Irrational Numbers**: The closure property does not apply to irrational numbers in the same manner.
Let's assume that the sum of a rational number (let's call it \( r \)) and an irrational number (let's call it \( i \)) is rational. If we denote the sum as \( s = r + i \), we can rearrange that to \( i = s - r \). Since \( s \) would be rational (as we assumed) and \( r \) is rational, \( s - r \) must also be rational (closure property of rational numbers). But that leads to a contradiction because we assumed \( i \) is irrational.
Thus, the assumption that the sum \( s \) is rational must be false, proving that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is indeed irrational.
Given the answer choices provided, none of them accurately captures this reasoning. However, the correct reasoning can be summarized as:
- The sum or difference of a rational and irrational number is irrational.
So, the correct understanding would be that they could indeed rephrase this as:
- The sum or difference of a rational and an irrational number is not rational, thus it must be irrational.
None of the provided options correctly reflect this.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!