Which statement is an example providing evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation?(1 point)ResponsesLaws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.

Question

Which statement is an example providing evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation?(1 point)ResponsesLaws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.

👇

1 answer
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
2 months ago

The statement that most clearly provides evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation is:

**"Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter."**

This distinction illustrates that laws describe observable phenomena (such as the relationship between action and reaction forces), while theories provide explanations for how and why those phenomena occur (such as the explanation involving electrostatic forces).