Use the following statement to answer the question.

Evolution happens due to natural selection, a process in which organisms that have the genes that are more suited to an environment survive. They pass on their traits to the next generation.

Is this a scientific law? Why or why not?

(1 point)
Yes, this statement is true.
Yes, this statement describes how evolution occurs, but does not explain how.
No, this statement is supported by evidence that comes from experimentation and observations.
No, this statement explains how evolution occurs.

7 answers

The correct answer is: No, this statement explains how evolution occurs.

This is because the statement describes the mechanism of evolution (natural selection) rather than presenting a law or universally applicable principle. Scientific laws typically describe phenomena that occur universally under certain conditions, while this statement explains a process that describes the relationship between traits and survival in an evolutionary context.

Use the following statement to answer the question.

Evolution happens due to natural selection, a process in which organisms that have the genes that are more suited to an environment survive. They pass on their traits to the next generation.

Is this a scientific law? Why or why not?

(1 point)
Yes, this statement is true.

Yes, this statement describes how evolution occurs, but does not explain how.

No, this statement is supported by evidence that comes from experimentation and observations.

No, this statement explains how evolution occurs.

The correct answer is: No, this statement explains how evolution occurs.

This answer is appropriate because the statement provides a mechanism (natural selection) for evolution rather than presenting a universal scientific law. It describes the process and rationale behind evolutionary change, rather than a consistent law-like statement about observations in nature.

What could happen if a scientist discovered new information concerning a scientific theory? (1 point)

Nothing would change since laws and theories have completely different components and are not interchangeable.
The new information could be used to create another, slightly different theory.
The new information could be used to change the theory into a law.
Nothing would change since laws and theories have similar components and are interchangeable

The correct answer is: The new information could be used to create another, slightly different theory.

Scientific theories are based on evidence and can evolve or be modified when new information is discovered. This allows scientists to refine existing theories or develop new ones to better explain observations and data. Scientific laws, on the other hand, describe specific phenomena and are not directly changed into theories.

What could happen if a scientist discovered new information concerning a scientific theory?

Nothing would change since laws and theories have completely different components and are not interchangeable.
The new information could be used to create another, slightly different theory.
The new information could be used to change the theory into a law.
Nothing would change since laws and theories have similar components and are interchangeable

The most accurate answer is: The new information could be used to create another, slightly different theory.

When new information is discovered regarding a scientific theory, it may lead to modifications, refinements, or even the development of a new theory that better explains the data. Scientific theories are subject to change based on new evidence, while scientific laws describe what happens under certain conditions and are not changed into theories.