Asked by @_@
Which of following explains what happens if the judicial branch finds that a law does not meet the criteria of the rule of law?(1 point)
Responses
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch has no power to fix the problem, since it has no law-making powers.
Responses
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch has no power to fix the problem, since it has no law-making powers.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is:
**The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.**
When the judicial branch finds that a law does not meet the criteria of the rule of law, it has the authority to declare that law unconstitutional, effectively nullifying it.
**The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.**
When the judicial branch finds that a law does not meet the criteria of the rule of law, it has the authority to declare that law unconstitutional, effectively nullifying it.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!