Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Ryiaz claims it is impossible to prove that a rational number multiplied by an irrational number gives an irrational product. H...Question
Ryiaz claims it is impossible to prove that a rational number multiplied by an irrational number gives an irrational productHow can you prove this? (1 point) by using a proof by contradiction to show multiplication is a closed operation for rational numbers by creating a proof that shows directly how multiplying a rational and irrational number leads to an irrational answer He's correct , it is impossible to prove in any way by choosing random numbers to plug into multiplication problems until he's convinced
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To prove that multiplying a rational number by an irrational number yields an irrational product, we can use **proof by contradiction.**
Let’s denote the rational number as \( r \) and the irrational number as \( x \). We assume that when we multiply \( r \) and \( x \), the product \( r \cdot x \) is a rational number.
Since \( r \) is a rational number, we can express it as \( r = \frac{a}{b} \) where \( a \) and \( b \) are integers and \( b \neq 0 \).
Now, if we assume that \( r \cdot x \) is rational, we can denote it as \( q \), where \( q \) is a rational number. Therefore, we can express our equation as:
\[
r \cdot x = q
\]
This can be rearranged as:
\[
x = \frac{q}{r}
\]
Since \( r = \frac{a}{b} \), we find:
\[
x = \frac{q \cdot b}{a}
\]
Here, \( q \cdot b \) and \( a \) are both integers (since the product of rational numbers remains rational and the property of integers' closure under multiplication), meaning that \( \frac{q \cdot b}{a} \) is written as a fraction of integers (where \( a \neq 0 \)), hence \( x \) would be rational.
However, this leads to a contradiction because we started with the assumption that \( x \) is irrational.
Thus, our initial assumption that \( r \cdot x \) is rational must be false. Consequently, the product of a non-zero rational number and an irrational number must indeed be irrational.
Therefore, we have proven by contradiction that multiplying a rational number by an irrational number results in an irrational product.
Let’s denote the rational number as \( r \) and the irrational number as \( x \). We assume that when we multiply \( r \) and \( x \), the product \( r \cdot x \) is a rational number.
Since \( r \) is a rational number, we can express it as \( r = \frac{a}{b} \) where \( a \) and \( b \) are integers and \( b \neq 0 \).
Now, if we assume that \( r \cdot x \) is rational, we can denote it as \( q \), where \( q \) is a rational number. Therefore, we can express our equation as:
\[
r \cdot x = q
\]
This can be rearranged as:
\[
x = \frac{q}{r}
\]
Since \( r = \frac{a}{b} \), we find:
\[
x = \frac{q \cdot b}{a}
\]
Here, \( q \cdot b \) and \( a \) are both integers (since the product of rational numbers remains rational and the property of integers' closure under multiplication), meaning that \( \frac{q \cdot b}{a} \) is written as a fraction of integers (where \( a \neq 0 \)), hence \( x \) would be rational.
However, this leads to a contradiction because we started with the assumption that \( x \) is irrational.
Thus, our initial assumption that \( r \cdot x \) is rational must be false. Consequently, the product of a non-zero rational number and an irrational number must indeed be irrational.
Therefore, we have proven by contradiction that multiplying a rational number by an irrational number results in an irrational product.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.