A scientist claims that water balls at 100°C repeated trials result in similar data every time other scientist can replicate the experiment with similar results and come to the same conclusion. What is this an example of is it a prediction a theory proof or support?

Answer 1

The situation you described is an example of support for a scientific claim. When multiple scientists perform the same experiment under similar conditions and obtain consistent results, it lends support to the conclusion that water boils at 100°C at standard atmospheric pressure.

If the results were consistently replicated, it strengthens the reliability of the claim, but it does not necessarily constitute a theory or proof. A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence, while proof is a term more commonly associated with mathematics and logic rather than empirical science. In this case, the repeated experiments provide support for the claim regarding the boiling point of water.