Let Alex's year of birth be \( x \) and his mother's year of birth be \( y \).
Given that in 2017, Alex’s age is equal to the sum of the digits of his year of birth, we can express Alex’s age as: \[ \text{Alex's age} = 2017 - x \] We also know: \[ \text{Sum of digits of } x = S(x) \] Thus, we have: \[ 2017 - x = S(x) \]
For Alex's mother, her age in 2017 is: \[ \text{Mother's age} = 2017 - y \] And similarly, we can express this in terms of the sum of the digits of her year of birth: \[ 2017 - y = S(y) \]
We first analyze the possible years for Alex's birth. Typically, people are born around the ages of 0 to 100 years in the year 2017, so Alex's year of birth could reasonably be between 1917 and 2017.
Next, we want to find out \( x \) for which \( S(x) = 2017 - x \).
Calculating \( S(x) \) for the candidates, we notice that:
- If \( x = 2000 + n \) (for \( n \) from 0 to 17, corresponding to 2000 through 2017), then: \[ S(x) = 2 + \text{(sum of digits of } n) \] For example:
- If \( n = 0, x = 2000 \Rightarrow S(2000) = 2 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 2 \Rightarrow 2017 - 2000 = 17\) (not equal).
- If \( n = 1, x = 2001 \Rightarrow S(2001) = 2 + 0 + 0 + 1 = 3 \Rightarrow 2017 - 2001 = 16\) (not equal).
- Continuing this, it's evident \( n \) in [0, 9] gives the maximum total less than 17, hence we start looking below \( 2000 \).
Continuing with years leading up to \( 1999 \):
- For \( x = 1990 \Rightarrow S(1990) = 1 + 9 + 9 + 0 = 19\) and \( 2017 - 1990 = 27\) (not equal).
- For \( x = 1993 \Rightarrow S(1993) = 1 + 9 + 9 + 3 = 22\) and \( 2017 - 1993 = 24\) (not equal).
Moving to \( x = 1980 \) through \( x = 1999\):
-
If \( x = 1989 \Rightarrow S(1989) = 1 + 9 + 8 + 9 = 27\) and \( 2017 - 1989 = 28\) (not equal).
-
Let’s try \( x = 1995 \Rightarrow S(1995) = 1 + 9 + 9 + 5 = 24\) and \( 2017 - 1995 = 22\) (not equal).
At \( x = 2008 \), \( S(2008) \rightarrow 10 \):
Now find \( y \): If Alex is 9 (2008-2017), mother born \( 1980 \), \[ 2017 - 1980 = 37 ; S(1980) = 1 + 9 + 8 + 0 = 18 \] Different year combinations could be narrowed.
Eventually identifying people near 30s (1940-1930 often yields consistent).
Looking at \( 1988 \):
- \( x = 1990 \Rightarrow S(1990) = 10\) gives \( 27\) Verify with strength modulo patterns, ultimately facilitates approach \( z = t + 9y\) where cycling occurs.
Specifically:
- Cross-verify mother birthed
- Finally, Alex's mother was when Alex at estimated depth \( 23\) (33-10) thus:
The simple relationship between both births leads us concluding that: \( 2017-x = S(x)|y = 2017 - …\ y - 23 = 25 \), thus conclusive})
Leveraging floors consistently yields mother ages around \( \text{ const} + 18,19,20 \)
Summarily, Alex was birthed at an age which deductively confirms 13. Thus \( 33 \) toward his maternal flow where she (13) years back served as decimal limits aligning birth ranges around each: [ \textit{Answer} = Alex's mother was} age 23 when birthed Alex.
1 answer