To determine which choice best supports the conclusion that introducing a paywall is generally more beneficial for larger newspapers, we need to look for data that demonstrates a stronger positive revenue change for larger newspapers compared to smaller ones.
Evaluating the choices:
-
Choice A: It compares the total revenue changes of the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times but does not provide evidence specific to their size or the benefits of the paywall.
-
Choice B: It states that the Los Angeles Times, presumably a larger paper, had a smaller percentage revenue change than the Chicago Tribune. This does not support the conclusion that paywalls are more beneficial for larger newspapers.
-
Choice C: It shows that the New York Times, likely a larger newspaper, had a significant positive change (20%), while the Denver Post, which is generally smaller, had a negative change (−1%). This supports the conclusion that larger newspapers benefit more from paywalls.
-
Choice D: It states that the Denver Post had the smallest percentage change, but it does not provide a direct comparison that supports the positive impact of paywalls on larger newspapers.
Based on the analysis, Choice C best supports Chung and colleagues’ conclusion that introducing a paywall is generally more beneficial for larger newspapers.