To determine the summarizing mistake made by Reese, we need to review the provided quotation and understand its core ideas. The quotation discusses the impact of legal systems on gender relations and emphasizes that differentiation between men and women based on arbitrary distinctions prevents them from recognizing each other's humanity.
Given this understanding, let's evaluate the options:
A. used too many of the author's words - This would apply if Reese's summary closely mirrored the original language without significant alterations. However, without additional context, it's difficult to confirm this.
B. left out an important idea - If Reese's summary omits key themes of the quotation, such as the impact of legal systems on social perceptions of gender, it could be an important omission.
C. paraphrased instead of summarized - Paraphrasing involves rewording the original text without condensing it into a summary, which means the essential ideas might still be overly detailed.
D. included a personal opinion - This would indicate that Reese added his own views or interpretations, which are not reflective of the original meaning of the text.
Based on the content of the quotation, the most likely summarizing mistake Reese made is:
B. left out an important idea.
The significant themes of the societal implications of gender differentiation and the necessity of recognizing humanity beyond sex distinctions are crucial and must be included in a proper summary. Without these elements, the summary may fail to convey the full meaning of the original text.