Read the passage from a debate speech.

Question

The current trade situation in this nation is
unacceptable. We continue to lose money to other
nations, while those nations prosper. I have a detailed
plan to get our country-and its people back on the
right track. My opponent, who uses her time to spread
lies and rumors while eating nice dinners bought by you
taxpayers, does not even have a plan. I question her
priorities.

Which statement best explains why the evidence
provided in the text is a fallacy?

A. The speaker uses anecdotal evidence with phrases
like "back on the right track."

B. The speaker uses a bandwagon statement by
complaining that other nations prosper.

C. The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by
attacking an opponent's honesty

D. The speaker uses a false dilemma by claiming to
have the ideal plan.

Answer 1

C. The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by attacking an opponent's honesty.

This statement best explains why the evidence provided in the text is a fallacy because the speaker focuses on criticizing the opponent's character and actions (e.g., spreading lies and rumors, enjoying taxpayer-funded dinners) rather than addressing the actual debate topic or providing substantial evidence for their own claims.