Summarise and paraphrase:

Question

The Draft Framework is divided into five parts.
Part 1 addresses the challenges associated with
human genome editing, bearing in mind its scientific
potential and giving a concise overview of ethical
concerns. Part 2 speaks to the need to establish
global baseline standards while acknowledging that
different regulatory approaches may be required
taking into account that the harm–benefit analysis
varies across jurisdictions. Part 3 proposes values
and principles such as human dignity, which ought
to be taken into consideration in regulating human
genome editing. Part 4 acknowledges existing infrastructure, including institutions and civil society,
which would need to be leveraged to facilitate the
establishment of global standards. Part 5 recognises
that human genome editing may be applied in a
wide range of settings, including heritable genome
editing, and thus sets out different scenarios—with
the aim of illustrating how the principles outlined
under part 3 conjoin.

Answer 1

The Draft Framework is divided into five parts, which address the challenges of human genome editing, the need for global standards, proposed values and principles, existing infrastructure, and different scenarios for applying human genome editing. These parts aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the ethical concerns and regulatory considerations surrounding human genome editing.