Side A: Proponents of teaching cursive believe that it is important for students to learn this skill because it can improve hand-eye coordination, increase reading comprehension, and even boost brain activity. They argue that cursive writing can be a form of self-expression and artistry, and that it is a valuable skill to have in today's society.
Side B: Opponents of teaching cursive argue that it is a dated skill that is no longer necessary in the digital age. They believe that cursive writing is not as practical as typing and that there are more important skills for students to learn, such as computer literacy and coding. They also point out that many schools have limited resources and time, so teaching cursive takes away from other, more relevant subjects.
My opinion: I believe that teaching cursive can still be valuable for students, even in today's digital world. While it may not be as essential as it once was, learning cursive can still have benefits for students, such as improving fine motor skills and allowing them to read historical documents or letters written in cursive. Additionally, some research suggests that writing in cursive can improve memory and cognitive skills. Therefore, I believe that cursive should continue to be taught in schools, albeit perhaps with less emphasis than in the past.
There are different ideas about teaching cursive. What does each side think is most important? Write how their ideas are different. Then, write what you think about teaching cursive. Use facts from the article. You can use your own thinking, too.
Want some word ideas? Look at this table.
1 answer
1 answer