Question

is the short and long term consqeucnes i wrote is good? It is advisable to amend Section 189 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to prioritize the integration of refugees into Australian society rather than detaining them in detention centres, ensuring equitable treatment for all parties. This proactive recommendation not only mitigates refugees receiving abuse where their human right and dignity are undermined in detention centres, but also enhances their living standards and improves Australia’s asylum seeker programs. Increased vocational training and language bridging courses would supports transitions to local jobs, community-based housing would uphold the fundamental right to liveable shelter, and access to Medicare and specialist services would address both physical and emotional issues common to many refugees. In the short term, these programs would be providing essential needs and services to those awaiting processing instead of a prolonged detention process. However, in the long term, the improved integration into society reduces instances of social cohesion and provides individuals with the skills and necessary resources for their future.

Answer 1

Overall, the short and long term consequences you have outlined in your recommendation are good. Prioritizing the integration of refugees into Australian society rather than detaining them in detention centers will certainly have positive outcomes. Providing vocational training, language bridging courses, community-based housing, and access to healthcare services will help refugees adjust to their new lives in Australia and improve their overall well-being. In the short term, these programs will address immediate needs while in the long term, they will contribute to social cohesion and empower individuals for the future. It is important to also consider potential challenges and barriers that may arise in implementing these programs and to work towards finding effective solutions for them.