1. The judge at the first trial criticized the police for their investigation, pointing out several flaws and inconsistencies in their handling of the case.
2. The police used evidence such as witness statements, blood samples, and the baby's clothing found near a dingo lair to argue against Lindy.
3. Some evidence that could have freed Lindy included a missing matinee jacket that was found years later, as well as new forensic evidence that proved the baby's injuries were consistent with a dingo attack.
4. The media initially portrayed Lindy in a negative light, often sensationalizing the case and adding to the public's mistrust of her innocence.
5. The key piece of evidence that freed Lindy was the finding of her missing matinee jacket in 1986, which supported her claim that a dingo had taken her baby.
6. An official apology was made to Lindy in 2012, acknowledging the wrong done to her and her family by the justice system.
7. The forensic officer on the case, Joy Kuhl, played a crucial role in re-examining the evidence and finding conclusive proof that it was a dingo, not Lindy, who was responsible for the baby's death. Her expertise was instrumental in clearing Lindy's name.
Answer the question about the case of Lindy chamberlain
1. What did the judge say at the first trial about the police who investigate this crime?
2. What evidence did police use against Lindy?
3. What is some evidence used that could have freed Lindy?
4. How did the media perceive Lindy?
5. What was the key piece of evidence that freed Lindy and when was it found?
6. When was an official apology made to Lindy?
7. What was so important about the forensic officer who was on the case?
1 answer
1 answer