A) The argument that high levels of inequality have led to political instability in Latin America is supported by the fact that an elite social group, rooted in colonial power, controls much of the region's resources and money. This unequal distribution of wealth leads institutions to prioritize the needs of this elite group over the general population, creating social and economic disparities that can fuel political unrest.
D) Additionally, the focus on economic growth in institutions like plantations, which do not provide well-paid employment, has led to a lack of high-paying job opportunities in the region. This economic inequality can contribute to discontent among the population and increase the likelihood of political instability.
In conclusion, the concentration of wealth and resources in the hands of a small elite group, along with limited economic opportunities for the majority of the population, have fueled political instability in Latin America by creating social and economic disparities that can lead to unrest and conflict.
Analyze the argument that high levels of inequality have led to political instability in Latin America.(1 point)
Responses
A)An elite social group with its roots in the power of the Spanish, Portuguese, and French colonial elite still controls much of the region's resources and money. This causes institutions to look after the needs of this elite group, rather than all of a country’s population.
An elite social group with its roots in the power of the Spanish, Portuguese, and French colonial elite still controls much of the region's resources and money. This causes institutions to look after the needs of this elite group, rather than all of a country’s population.
B)Over time, Latin America’s communist economic and social policies have cooled. For example, many Latin Americans are now able to own private businesses, which was not allowed in the past.
Over time, Latin America’s communist economic and social policies have cooled. For example, many Latin Americans are now able to own private businesses, which was not allowed in the past.
C)In the middle of the twentieth century, Cuba appeared to be doing quite well. It was growing economically and socially. By the 1950s, however, it was no longer doing so well.
In the middle of the twentieth century, Cuba appeared to be doing quite well. It was growing economically and socially. By the 1950s, however, it was no longer doing so well.
D)Throughout the twentieth century, economic growth was focused on institutions, such as plantations, that do not supply a lot of well-paid employment. The region has fewer well-paid jobs available than other regions.
1 answer
1 answer