1. Proponents of Australia's current approach argue that the country is upholding its international obligations by maintaining strict border control measures and deterring illegal immigration. They argue that Australia has a responsibility to protect its citizens and ensure that resources are not overwhelmed by an influx of refugees. They also contend that Australia still provides assistance to refugees through its humanitarian program and resettlement efforts.
2. Critics of Australia's current approach assert that the country is failing to meet its obligations under key human rights treaties and conventions by implementing harsh policies, such as offshore processing and mandatory detention, that violate the rights of asylum seekers. They argue that Australia's focus on deterring and punishing refugees undermines its commitment to protecting the rights of those fleeing persecution and violence. They also argue that Australia's lack of leadership and cooperation in addressing the global refugee crisis further illustrates its failure to uphold international obligations.
What are 2 opposing viewpoints related to this question: to what extent does
Australia's current approach to addressing the global refugee crisis uphold their
international obligations under key human rights treaties and conventions?
1 answer