Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day. Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail. In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing.

Answer 1

The evidence provided is relevant as it explains alternative voting options for those unable to vote in person on Election Day. However, the evidence is not sufficient on its own to fully convince individuals of the claim as it does not address potential barriers or restrictions that may still prevent some individuals from voting through these alternative methods. Additional information may be needed to fully support the claim.