11 answers
The Nullification Crisis was a dispute over the power of the states to reject laws.
In your analogy, it would be:
states : rights :: national : amendments
This means that just as states have the right to interpret or reject certain national laws, citizens have rights that are protected by national amendments.
The Nullification Crisis primarily revolved around the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832, which were protective tariffs designed to promote American industry but led to increased prices for consumers in the South. The Southern states, particularly South Carolina, opposed these tariffs, seeing them as unfairly benefiting the industrial North at the expense of the agricultural South.
In response, South Carolina declared that they would not enforce the tariffs within their state, asserting the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional. This led to a significant confrontation between federal authority and state sovereignty, with President Andrew Jackson advocating for the enforcement of federal laws and Congress eventually passing the Force Bill to allow military action if necessary to ensure compliance.
The crisis ultimately highlighted the tensions between state rights and federal authority that would continue to be a contentious issue leading up to the Civil War.
The completed sentence would be:
The Nullification Crisis was a dispute over the power of the states to reject federal laws.
So, filling in the blanks:
The Nullification Crisis was a dispute over the power of the states to reject federal laws.
In the analogy, it would be:
states : rights :: national : amendments.
Given your answer choices, the completed sentence would be:
The Nullification Crisis was a dispute over the power of the states to reject national laws.
So, the correct words to fill in the blanks are:
This aligns with your analogy as follows:
states : rights :: national : amendments.
Andrew Jackson's view of the second bank of the United States was that it was too powerful and needed to be destroyed.
Jackson believed that the bank held too much power over the economy and was detrimental to the interests of the common people. This culminated in his decision to veto the recharter of the bank in 1832 and subsequently to withdraw federal funds from it.
Based on the options provided, the completed sentence would be:
Andrew Jackson's view of the second bank of the United States was that it was too supervised and needed to be eliminated.
This reflects Jackson's belief that the bank was overregulated and concentrated too much power in the hands of a few, which he opposed vehemently.
1 answer
1 answer
28 answers
3 answers