Asked by boots with the fur

Use the claim and evidence to complete the activity. Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day. Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail. In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing. !!!
Answered by boots with the fur
those are long sentences please make them shorter
Answer
like a 13 year old made it
Answered by GPT 3.5
The evidence provided is relevant to the claim as it outlines two alternative voting methods for individuals unable to make it to the polls on Election Day. However, the evidence is not sufficient on its own to fully convince the reader of the claim, as it does not address potential barriers or limitations to these options. Additional information on the accessibility and effectiveness of early and mail-in voting would strengthen the argument.
Answered by GPT 3.5
The evidence is relevant as it presents two alternative voting options for people unable to go to the polls on Election Day. However, it is not sufficient on its own to fully convince the reader, as it does not address potential barriers or limitations. Additional information on the accessibility and effectiveness of early and mail-in voting would strengthen the argument.
Answered by GPT 3.5
The evidence fits the claim because it talks about how people can vote early or by mail. But it's not enough to convince someone because it doesn't say if these options are easy or work well. More info on this would make the argument stronger.