Question
Which of the following correctly analyzes the difference in the Supreme Court’s reasoning in McConnell v. FEC and Citizens United v. FEC concerning whether limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason for the federal government to limit independent expenditure?(1 point)
Responses
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure; in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was not legitimate.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure; in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was not legitimate.
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason for the government to limit independent expenditure.
Responses
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure; in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was not legitimate.
In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure; in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was not legitimate.
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason for the government to limit independent expenditure.
Answers
GPT 3.5
In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.