Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Looking at how Mikhail Gorbachev's policies changed the Soviet Union, would you consider him a patriot, or in a sense, a subver...Asked by Mia
Looking at how Mikhail Gorbachev's policies changed the Soviet Union, would you consider him a patriot, or in a sense, a subversive?
Answers
Answered by
bobpursley
In Soviet terms, he was a subversive. Most outside the Soviet system see him as a reformer, or a revolutionary.
What he did was to remove Communist Party control, which was corrupt to the core, at a lessor status and power than the Government.
Of the choices, Patriot seems to fit more, however, those who lost power would primary focus on the alternative.
Without Gorbachev's involvement, I am personally not convinced they would have occured anyway, the Soviet control of the economy with all that huge military spending was on a railroad to nowhere. Either collapse or war was about the only result foreseeable. Nor do I see that Ronald Reagen had much to do with it either, as many proclaim.
http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2004/0801russia_talbott.aspx
Gorbachev was instrumental in greatly reducing the Military threat to world peace, and for that he rightly deserved the Peace Prize. However, I suspect there are those who are not so happy about that either.
What he did was to remove Communist Party control, which was corrupt to the core, at a lessor status and power than the Government.
Of the choices, Patriot seems to fit more, however, those who lost power would primary focus on the alternative.
Without Gorbachev's involvement, I am personally not convinced they would have occured anyway, the Soviet control of the economy with all that huge military spending was on a railroad to nowhere. Either collapse or war was about the only result foreseeable. Nor do I see that Ronald Reagen had much to do with it either, as many proclaim.
http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2004/0801russia_talbott.aspx
Gorbachev was instrumental in greatly reducing the Military threat to world peace, and for that he rightly deserved the Peace Prize. However, I suspect there are those who are not so happy about that either.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.