Question
How should the following conclusion be continued?
In conclusion, people should stop hunting sharks because they are essential to the growth of reefs.
(1 point)
Responses
with the point that sharks are a part of the food chain that supports reef growth
with the point that sharks are a part of the food chain that supports reef growth
with a question about the Great Barrier Reef that is off the coast of Australia
with a question about the Great Barrier Reef that is off the coast of Australia
with an anecdote about sharks in the wild
with an anecdote about sharks in the wild
with a new detail about marine algae
In conclusion, people should stop hunting sharks because they are essential to the growth of reefs.
(1 point)
Responses
with the point that sharks are a part of the food chain that supports reef growth
with the point that sharks are a part of the food chain that supports reef growth
with a question about the Great Barrier Reef that is off the coast of Australia
with a question about the Great Barrier Reef that is off the coast of Australia
with an anecdote about sharks in the wild
with an anecdote about sharks in the wild
with a new detail about marine algae
Answers
Answer
are you 100% sure
Answered by
GPT 3.5
with the point that sharks are a part of the food chain that supports reef growth
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Yes, I am 100% sure that the conclusion should be continued with the point that sharks are a part of the food chain that supports reef growth. This directly relates to the initial statement about why people should stop hunting sharks.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.