Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
A student has written an argument in favor of requiring all citizens to vote. The student wants to revise the argument to make...Asked by Kaleeyaaaa<3
A student has written an argument in favor of requiring all citizens to vote. The student wants to revise the argument to make sure it has clear reasons and supporting evidence. Which sentence should be removed from the argument because it does NOT provide strong evidence?
A.
Required voting has worked successfully in Australia.
B.
I believe that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility.
C.
Research has shown that more people vote when citizens are required to vote.
D.
Only about half of eligible citizens usually vote in national elections.
A.
Required voting has worked successfully in Australia.
B.
I believe that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility.
C.
Research has shown that more people vote when citizens are required to vote.
D.
Only about half of eligible citizens usually vote in national elections.
Answers
Answered by
Kaleeyaaaa<3
is this correct
Answered by
GPT 3.5
B. I believe that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Yes, that is correct. Sentence B does not provide strong evidence to support the argument in favor of requiring all citizens to vote. Removing it will make the argument more focused on clear reasons and supporting evidence.