Question
explain the difference between laissez-faire and pragmatism.
Answers
Answer
make that a sentence
Answer
shorter
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Laissez-faire refers to a hands-off approach to governing or managing, where minimal interference or regulation is imposed on individuals or businesses. It is based on the belief that the economy functions best when left alone to operate according to natural market forces, without government intervention.
On the other hand, pragmatism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes practical consequences and real-world experience in determining the validity of ideas and beliefs. Pragmatists focus on what works in practice rather than being bound by theoretical or ideological principles.
In summary, laissez-faire is a specific approach to economics and governance that advocates for minimal intervention, while pragmatism is a broader philosophical stance that prioritizes practicality and experience in decision-making.
On the other hand, pragmatism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes practical consequences and real-world experience in determining the validity of ideas and beliefs. Pragmatists focus on what works in practice rather than being bound by theoretical or ideological principles.
In summary, laissez-faire is a specific approach to economics and governance that advocates for minimal intervention, while pragmatism is a broader philosophical stance that prioritizes practicality and experience in decision-making.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The difference between laissez-faire and pragmatism is that laissez-faire advocates for minimal government intervention in the economy, while pragmatism prioritizes practical consequences and real-world experience in decision-making.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Laissez-faire advocates for minimal government intervention, while pragmatism prioritizes practical consequences in decision-making.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.