Asked by Paula
                From the decimal form of 1/13 we pick 99 consecutive digits and treat it as a 99-digit number. Can this number be divisible by 3?
  
            
            
        Answers
                    Answered by
            Reiny
            
    1/13 is a repeating decimal,
.076923 076923 07... the length of the repetition is 6 and sum of each loop is 27
so as long as we add up exact number of loops, we would have as sum a multiple of 27, clearly divisible by 3
but 99/6 is not a whole number, namely 16.5
that means we would add up 16 complete loops plus the next 3 digits of wherever we started.
Now, no matter where we started, the next 3 digits are not a multiple of 3.
e.g.
7+6+9 = 22
6+9+2 = 17
9+2+3 = 14
2+3+0 = 5
3+0+7 = 10
0+7+6 = 13
So, no, the sum of any consecutive 99 digits is not divisible by 3
    
.076923 076923 07... the length of the repetition is 6 and sum of each loop is 27
so as long as we add up exact number of loops, we would have as sum a multiple of 27, clearly divisible by 3
but 99/6 is not a whole number, namely 16.5
that means we would add up 16 complete loops plus the next 3 digits of wherever we started.
Now, no matter where we started, the next 3 digits are not a multiple of 3.
e.g.
7+6+9 = 22
6+9+2 = 17
9+2+3 = 14
2+3+0 = 5
3+0+7 = 10
0+7+6 = 13
So, no, the sum of any consecutive 99 digits is not divisible by 3
                    Answered by
            bobpursley
            
    I agree.
    
                    Answered by
            Paula
            
    Thanks a bunch!
    
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.