Reread the arguments on the previous slide about the positive and negative aspects of social media. In a well-constructed paragraph:

Question

evaluate which argument is more effective.
identify the authors’ claims, reasons, and evidence.
compare and contrast the perspectives of the authors.
identify fallacies used by either side.

Answer 1

Both arguments presented on the previous slide offer valid points regarding the positive and negative aspects of social media. The argument in favor of social media being positive is more effective due to its well-supported claims, well-constructed reasoning, and strong evidence. The author claims that social media allows for enhanced connectivity and communication, fosters creativity and self-expression, and provides a platform for social change. The reasons provided are logical, highlighting how social media facilitates staying connected with loved ones, sharing ideas and talents, and mobilizing communities for important causes. The evidence given includes statistical data on the widespread usage and positive impact of social media on various aspects of society. In contrast, the argument against social media is weaker, primarily relying on personal anecdotes and subjective viewpoints rather than concrete evidence or logical reasoning. Fallacies used by the opposing side include the use of emotional appeals without supporting evidence, generalizations, and anecdotal evidence that cannot be considered representative of the overall impact of social media.