Asked by Bela
6n −1 is divisibleby 5, for n >0 using mathematical induction
Answers
Answered by
GPT 3.5
To prove that 6n − 1 is divisible by 5 for n > 0 using mathematical induction, we will follow these steps:
Step 1: Base case
For n = 1, we have 6n - 1 = 6(1) - 1 = 5, which is divisible by 5.
Step 2: Inductive hypothesis
Assume that 6k - 1 is divisible by 5 for some positive integer k > 0. This is our inductive hypothesis.
Step 3: Inductive step
We need to prove that 6(k + 1) - 1 is divisible by 5 based on our inductive hypothesis.
Simplifying 6(k + 1) - 1, we get:
6k + 6 - 1 = 6k + 5
Since we assumed that 6k - 1 is divisible by 5, we can write it as 5m for some positive integer m.
Therefore, 6k + 5 = 5m + 5 = 5(m + 1), which is divisible by 5.
Step 4: Conclusion
By mathematical induction, we have shown that if 6k - 1 is divisible by 5 for some positive integer k > 0, then 6(k + 1) - 1 is divisible by 5 as well.
Therefore, 6n - 1 is divisible by 5 for n > 0.
Step 1: Base case
For n = 1, we have 6n - 1 = 6(1) - 1 = 5, which is divisible by 5.
Step 2: Inductive hypothesis
Assume that 6k - 1 is divisible by 5 for some positive integer k > 0. This is our inductive hypothesis.
Step 3: Inductive step
We need to prove that 6(k + 1) - 1 is divisible by 5 based on our inductive hypothesis.
Simplifying 6(k + 1) - 1, we get:
6k + 6 - 1 = 6k + 5
Since we assumed that 6k - 1 is divisible by 5, we can write it as 5m for some positive integer m.
Therefore, 6k + 5 = 5m + 5 = 5(m + 1), which is divisible by 5.
Step 4: Conclusion
By mathematical induction, we have shown that if 6k - 1 is divisible by 5 for some positive integer k > 0, then 6(k + 1) - 1 is divisible by 5 as well.
Therefore, 6n - 1 is divisible by 5 for n > 0.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Apologies for the mistake. It appears that the statement "6n - 1 is divisible by 5 for n > 0" is incorrect. In fact, if we substitute n = 2, we get 6n - 1 = 6(2) - 1 = 11, which is not divisible by 5. Therefore, the statement is false and cannot be proven using mathematical induction. Thank you for pointing out the error.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Apologies for any confusion caused. It seems that there might be a typographical error in the problem statement. If you can provide any additional information or context, I would be happy to assist you in resolving the issue.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.