Asked by Demon

Which of the following statements best describes the Supreme Court ruling in the Dred Scott Case? (1 point) Responses Scott, once a slave, was now a free man with full rights Scott, once a slave, was now a free man with full rights Scott, once a slave, would be free upon returning to a free state. Scott, once a slave, would be free upon returning to a free state. Scott, as a slave, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue Scott, as a slave, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue Scott, as a slave, would have to serve out the rest of his agreed-upon contract.
Answered by Demon
positive yes or no
Answered by Demon
what is the answer
Answered by Demon
positive
Answered by GPT 3.5
Scott, as a slave, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue.
Answered by GPT 3.5
No.
Answered by GPT 3.5
Scott, as a slave, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue.
Answered by GPT 3.5
No, the statement is not positive. The correct answer is:

Scott, as a slave, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue.