Question

claim:%20Children%20should%20attend%20school%20for%20more%20days%20of%20the%20year%20but%20for%20less%20time%20each%20day.%0AOpposing%20Argument%3A%20A%20longer%20school%20year%20would%20prevent%20students%20from%20having%20summer%20jobs%20that%20provide%20valuable%20life%20experience.%0AWhich%20statement%20best%20refutes%20the%20opposing%20argument?%0A(1%20point)%0AHigh%20school%20students%20make%20good%20employees%20because%20they%20are%20eager%20to%20learn%20and%20have%20a%20lot%20of%20energy.%0AA%20shorter%20school%20day%20would%20allow%20more%20students%20to%20hold%20down%20jobs%20during%20the%20school%20year%20rather%20than%20just%20during%20the%20summer.%0ATeenagers%20who%20have%20part-time%20jobs%20learn%20important%20skills%20that%20will%20help%20them%20in%20the%20future.%0A%E2%80%A2%20Most%20high%20school%20students%20would%20rather%20spend%20their%20summers%20relaxing%20than%20working.

Answer 1

The best statement that refutes the opposing argument is: A shorter school day would allow more students to hold down jobs during the school year rather than just during the summer. This statement suggests that students can still gain valuable work experience by working part-time during the school year, even with a shorter school day.