Question
Why did Anti-Federalists argue for a Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution?
Why did Anti-Federalists argue for a Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution?
They believed a bill of rights was necessary to prevent a two-party system from becoming the norm.
They believed a bill of rights was a way to ensure that military funding would continue, which was important for American foreign policy.
They believed a bill of rights would provide a way for new states to be admitted to the Union.
They believed a bill of rights was necessary to protect Americans from a strong central government becoming tyrannical.
Why did Anti-Federalists argue for a Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution?
They believed a bill of rights was necessary to prevent a two-party system from becoming the norm.
They believed a bill of rights was a way to ensure that military funding would continue, which was important for American foreign policy.
They believed a bill of rights would provide a way for new states to be admitted to the Union.
They believed a bill of rights was necessary to protect Americans from a strong central government becoming tyrannical.
Answers
GPT 3.5
The correct answer is: They believed a bill of rights was necessary to protect Americans from a strong central government becoming tyrannical.
The Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for the central government to become too powerful and infringe upon individual liberties. They argued that a bill of rights, which outlined specific rights and restrictions on the government, was necessary to protect citizens from potential tyranny.
The Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for the central government to become too powerful and infringe upon individual liberties. They argued that a bill of rights, which outlined specific rights and restrictions on the government, was necessary to protect citizens from potential tyranny.