Which campaign finance strategy would increase the influence of small individual donors?

One campaign finance strategy that could increase the influence of small individual donors is implementing a system of public financing for political campaigns. This strategy involves using government funds to support candidates who demonstrate a sufficient level of grassroots support from small individual donors.

By providing matching funds or grants to candidates who receive a significant number of small donations, this strategy aims to incentivize candidates to seek support from a larger pool of small donors, rather than relying heavily on large donations from wealthy individuals or special interest groups.

Public financing would level the playing field for candidates, as they would have access to funding to run competitive campaigns even if they lack personal wealth or connections to wealthy donors. This strategy would empower small individual donors, as their contributions would carry more weight compared to large, influential donors.

Furthermore, public financing would encourage candidates to focus on connecting with and addressing the concerns of everyday citizens, rather than catering to the wishes of a few wealthy contributors. This would potentially lead to policies that better represent the interests of the broader public.

Implementing stricter campaign finance regulations, such as limiting the total amount a candidate can receive from individual donors or placing tighter restrictions on donations from corporations and special interest groups, could also increase the influence of small individual donors. By reducing the influence of large donors, candidates would be more inclined to rely on small individual donors and prioritize their concerns over those of wealthier contributors.

Overall, these campaign finance strategies would provide a pathway for small individual donors to have a more significant impact on elections and policy decisions, thus increasing their influence in the political process.