The Declaration of Human Rights is supposed to make sure that all people are treated equally and with fairness. It's a way for countries to show that they care about human rights. But unfortunately, it doesn't seem like human rights are being respected any better now than they were before 1948.
Even though governments have said they will respect and follow human rights, it doesn't always happen in reality. There's a big difference between what they say they will do and what they actually do. It's like there's a gap between their promises and their actions.
But at least now, there is a set of rules that countries have agreed on. This means that the international community can judge how well governments are doing when it comes to respecting human rights. They now have a common standard to measure and compare countries' actions.
The final judgment of history will be determined by the impact which the Declaration [of Human Rights] has and will have on the actual conduct of states and of individual men and women everywhere. There is unfortunately little reason for thinking that human rights...are better respected now that they were before 1948. But while the gap between commitment and performance may still be wide, governments are now formally committed to respect and observe human rights. And the international community now possesses "a common standard of achievement" by reference to which the conduct of these governments can be and is judged. write small critical idea
like a 7th grader
1 answer
1 answer