The first article says that there's a big problem with plastic garbage in the ocean. They talk about how the garbage patches are really big and it's hard to clean them up. They also mention that tiny pieces of plastic called micro-plastics are a big problem too. The sea creatures are getting hurt by all the plastic too. The author thinks the best solution is to tell people to stop throwing their trash in the ocean.
The second article says that making art out of plastic trash can help people understand the problem and make them use less plastic. There's this lady named Angela Haseltine Pozzi who started a group called Washed Ashore. They clean up the beaches and use the plastic they find to make sculptures of sea animals. The author says that this art is important because it shows how plastic hurts sea creatures and reminds people to keep plastic out of the ocean.
I think the second author's argument is better because they have a cool solution. Making art out of trash is a way to show people how bad the problem is and make them think about their plastic use. The first article just talks about the problem and doesn't give any ideas about what we can do.
In the first article, the author's claim is that the increasing amount of plastic trash in the ocean is a huge challenge and difficult to deal with. They support this claim by highlighting the vast size of the garbage patches, the difficulty of collecting micro-plastic, and the increasing harm to sea creatures. The author argues that the most practical solution is to persuade people to stop littering.
In the second article, the author's claim is that creating art from plastic trash can raise awareness about the issue and encourage people to reduce their plastic consumption. They support this claim by explaining how Angela Haseltine Pozzi started the organization Washed Ashore, which cleans up beaches and uses the collected plastics to create sculptures of sea animals. The author emphasizes the harmful effects of plastics on sea animals and the importance of keeping plastics out of the oceans.
Both authors present valid arguments, but the second author's argument is more convincing because they offer a tangible solution and provide evidence of its effectiveness. The art created by Washed Ashore serves as a visual representation of the problem and can have a powerful impact on raising awareness and changing behavior. On the other hand, the first author primarily focuses on the challenges posed by plastic trash without proposing a specific solution.
Make this essay sound like a 7th grader wrote it and use words that only a seventh grader would use
1 answer