What are the pros and cons of issue networks?(1 point) Responses The pros are that issue networks promote public interest. The cons are that they lack numbers, are prone to arguing, and their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they lack public interest. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest. The cons are that they lack numbers, are prone to arguing, and their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they lack public interest. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest and have strength in numbers. The cons are that their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks promote public interest and have strength in numbers. The cons are that their bonds are not as strong as the iron triangle and they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks’ internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks’ internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they’re prone to conflicts if they last too long. The pros are that issue networks internal bonds are nearly as strong as the iron triangle. The cons are that they lack public interest, last too long, and are prone to conflicts.
3 answers
However, issue networks also have some cons. Firstly, they may lack numbers compared to other policy-making networks like the iron triangle, which can make it harder to gain influence and drive change. Secondly, due to the diverse nature of the members within an issue network, disagreements and conflicts can arise. This can hinder progress and compromise the effectiveness of the network. Finally, unlike the iron triangle that often focuses on narrow policy areas, issue networks may struggle with maintaining their momentum and public interest over time, especially if the issue remains unresolved or if conflicting priorities arise.