Question

What are the risks and challenges of “all or nothing” advocacy?

Answer 1

It ignores the possibility of <I>compromise</I>, in which various aspects (usually less important) are sacrificed so that more important aspects might be achieved. In compromise nobody gets "all," but also everyone gets something — in contrast to "nothing."

In contrast, "all or nothing" is more likely to lead to conflict and war.

I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.