Writing poetry is like cooking.Novices always follow a recipeBecause they know no other wayWhile masters know preciselyWhat spices to add, how longTo bake the fish to make itDelectable, perfectly flaky.Those rare mastersKeep the restaurant of lifeAlways open.What is the implication of the analogy used in the poem?If chefs want to be truly great, they cannot always follow other people's recipes.Novice poets need to use precise rhythm or their works will turn out dry and tasteless.Poets who have mastered their craft do not need to follow a strict form.
3 answers
The implication of the analogy used in the poem is that in order to become a truly great poet, one cannot always follow other people's recipes or formulas. Just like chefs, poets need to have a deep understanding of their craft, know how to use the right spices (words and techniques), and have the ability to experiment and create their own unique dishes (works of poetry). The analogy suggests that master poets have the knowledge and skill to deviate from strict forms or rules and create something exceptional and original.
answer?
The implication of the analogy used in the poem is that if chefs want to be truly great, they cannot always follow other people's recipes. Similarly, novice poets need to rely on established forms and techniques in order to create poetry that is structurally sound and well-crafted. However, master poets who have truly mastered their craft have the freedom to deviate from strict forms and rules, allowing them to create unique and exceptional works of poetry. The analogy suggests that true mastery in both cooking and poetry comes from a deep understanding of the craft and the ability to experiment and create something original.
5 answers