In the case of Cheng v The Queen, it is implied that it is an appellate case rather than an express one. This is because an express case is explicitly mentioned or stated, while an implied case is inferred from the context or surrounding circumstances. However, without further information or context, it is difficult to provide a more detailed analysis of the case.
In less than 50 words, the summary of the case and outcome is not clear as it depends on which specific case and jurisdiction (such as Canada, Australia, or the UK) is being referred to.
In cheng v the queen can you explain wheter is express or implied explain why
and summary of the case and outcome in less than 50 wrdos
1 answer