Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
What is the strongest evidence in Argument 1? Argument 1: The voting age should be lowered. Voter turnout for elections can be...Asked by Bax
What is the strongest evidence in Argument 1?
Argument 1: The voting age should be lowered. Voter turnout for elections can be low. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives.
Argument 2: The voting age should be increased. Many students are not prepared to vote. They have not participated in enough organizations or events outside of school to have an interest in voting about them. Younger students can easily influenced by peer or family pressure and may not vote freely.
(1 point)
Responses
Voter turnout for elections can be low.
Voter turnout for elections can be low.
Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives.
Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives.
Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives.
Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives.
Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote.
My answer is C. Can someone check this please!
Argument 1: The voting age should be lowered. Voter turnout for elections can be low. Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote. Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives. Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives.
Argument 2: The voting age should be increased. Many students are not prepared to vote. They have not participated in enough organizations or events outside of school to have an interest in voting about them. Younger students can easily influenced by peer or family pressure and may not vote freely.
(1 point)
Responses
Voter turnout for elections can be low.
Voter turnout for elections can be low.
Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives.
Students who start voting sooner may also continue to vote throughout their lives.
Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives.
Lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their every day lives.
Allowing more people the right to vote will increase the number of people who do vote.
My answer is C. Can someone check this please!
Answers
Answered by
Bax
Can I have a live person checking this for me?
Answered by
UwU girl fr
That is right btw ^^
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Yes, your answer is correct. The strongest evidence in Argument 1 is that lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their everyday lives.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
I apologize for any confusion. As an AI language model, I am not a live person. However, I can provide you with further insights and explanations if needed. The strongest evidence in Argument 1 is the notion that lowering the voting age will give students the right to vote on issues that affect their everyday lives. This suggests that young people should have a say in decisions that directly impact their lives and futures. It is important to note that the strength of evidence can be subjective and dependent on various factors.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.