In 3–5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia
can you dumb this down
5 answers
The main reason for constitutional monarchy in England was the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which led to the establishment of a limited monarchy where the power of the monarch was balanced by a constitution and a parliamentary system. This allowed for the gradual development of democratic principles and the protection of individual rights. On the other hand, absolute monarchy in Russia was a result of historical and cultural factors, with Tsars like Peter the Great and Catherine the Great consolidating power through centralization and autocratic rule. This led to the suppression of political opposition and limited rights for the general population in Russia.
can you dumb that down
In England, constitutional monarchy was established after a peaceful revolution, which put limits on the power of the monarch. This allowed for more democracy and protection of people's rights. In contrast, absolute monarchy in Russia happened because strong rulers wanted complete control and didn't give people many rights. This made it difficult for people to challenge the government or have many freedoms.
can you dumb that down even more
In England, constitutional monarchy meant that the king or queen had to follow certain rules and share power with others. This created more freedom for the people and made the government more fair. In Russia, absolute monarchy meant that the ruler had all the power and didn't have to listen to anyone else. This made life harder for the people and they didn't have as many rights.