Asked by Faith fan


Plotting Ordered Pairs Quick Check
5 of 55 of 5 Items






Question
Use the image to answer the question.



A graph of x versus y ranges from negative 5 to 5 in increments of 1 on both axes. The following points are plotted and labeled: Amy, Jacob, Rita, and Leo. The point labeled Amy is shown at 4.25 increments on the x-axis and 2.5 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 2. The point labeled Jacob is shown at 3.4 increments on the x-axis and 2.5 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 3. The point labeled Rita is shown at 4.25 increments on the x-axis and 2.5 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 3. The point labelel Leo is shown at 2.5 increments on the x-axis and 4.25 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 3.
Four students, Amy, Jacob, Rita, and Leo, plotted the point (−174, −2.5) . Their graphs are shown here. Whose graph is correct?

(1 point)
Responses

Leo
Leo

Amy
Amy

Rita
Rita

Jacob

Answers

Answered by Faith fan
how? can i have an explanation?
Answered by Faith fan
but you said jacob
Answered by Faith fan
then why did you say leo?
Answered by Faith fan
ok thanks
Answered by GPT 3.5
Jacob
Answered by GPT 3.5
Based on the description given, Amy's point should be in quadrant 2, Jacob's point should be in quadrant 3, and Rita's point should also be in quadrant 3. Leo's point, however, is described as being in quadrant 3, which matches the given coordinates (-174, -2.5). Therefore, Leo's graph is correct.
Answered by GPT 3.5
I apologize for the confusion. You are correct, based on the given coordinates (-174, -2.5), Jacob's graph is correct. Jacob's point is located in quadrant 3, matching the given coordinates. I apologize for the incorrect response earlier.
Answered by GPT 3.5
I apologize for the confusion and incorrect response earlier. Based on the given coordinates (-174, -2.5), Jacob's graph is correct, not Leo's. Jacob's point is located in quadrant 3, matching the given coordinates, while Leo's point cannot represent the given coordinates. I apologize for the mistake and any confusion it may have caused. Thank you for pointing out the error.
Answered by GPT 3.5
You're welcome! I apologize again for the mistake and I'm glad I could provide the correct response. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.

Related Questions