Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
If 2 buses are needed to transport 75 students to the aquarium and 8 buses can transport 300 students to the aquarium, which pr...Asked by BOThelper
If 2 buses are needed to transport 75 students to the aquarium and 8 buses can transport 300 students to the aquarium, which proportion describes the relationship between the number of buses and the number of students? (Do not reduce the ratios to their lowest terms.)(1 point)
Responses
2/75 = 300/8
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 300 over 8 End Fraction
2/75 ≠ 8/300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
2/75 = 8/300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
75/2 = 8/300
Responses
2/75 = 300/8
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 300 over 8 End Fraction
2/75 ≠ 8/300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
2/75 = 8/300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
75/2 = 8/300
Answers
Answered by
BOThelper
Use the table to answer the question.
Time (years) Bear Population
1 6
20 120
60 240
One biologist claimed that the bear population was proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild. Based on the information in the table, would you agree? Explain your answer.
(1 point)
Responses
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
Skip to navigation
Time (years) Bear Population
1 6
20 120
60 240
One biologist claimed that the bear population was proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild. Based on the information in the table, would you agree? Explain your answer.
(1 point)
Responses
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
Skip to navigation
Answered by
BOThelper
One worker earns $85 in 2 weeks, and another earns $175 in 4 weeks. Are the pay rates proportional?(1 point)
Responses
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
No, because the ratios of weeks to dollars cannot be reduced.
Responses
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
No, because the ratios of weeks to dollars cannot be reduced.
Answered by
BOThelper
A car travels 110 miles/2 hours . What is the unit rate?(1 point)
Responses
one mile per 55 hours
one mile per 55 hours
2 hours per 110 miles
2 hours per 110 miles
110 miles per 2 hours
110 miles per 2 hours
55 miles per hour
Responses
one mile per 55 hours
one mile per 55 hours
2 hours per 110 miles
2 hours per 110 miles
110 miles per 2 hours
110 miles per 2 hours
55 miles per hour
Answered by
BOThelper
Use the image to answer the question.
Two price tags show the weight and cost of each bag. The first price tag shows a 2 pound bag, with a cost of 1 dollar and 99 cents, at 1 dollar per pound. The second price tag shows a 5 pound bag, with a cost of 3 dollars and 99 cents, at 0.80 cents per pound.
You have $10
to spend on carrots for your rabbits. Compare the prices for two different-sized bags. Which size is a better deal and why?
(1 point)
Responses
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less than the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less than the 2-lb. bag.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
Skip to navigation
Two price tags show the weight and cost of each bag. The first price tag shows a 2 pound bag, with a cost of 1 dollar and 99 cents, at 1 dollar per pound. The second price tag shows a 5 pound bag, with a cost of 3 dollars and 99 cents, at 0.80 cents per pound.
You have $10
to spend on carrots for your rabbits. Compare the prices for two different-sized bags. Which size is a better deal and why?
(1 point)
Responses
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less than the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less than the 2-lb. bag.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
Skip to navigation
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Start Fraction 75 over 2 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
110 miles per 2 hours
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.